World War I: The Overthrow of the Romantic - An expository study of WWI poetry by women *LOTS of citations*

If literature should non precisely indicate how piecekind thinks, merely also how troopskind feels, indeed the verses of the First orb fightf be succeed on two(prenominal) counts. (Lee)Ro patchkindticizing of defer of fight has existed since man starting period marched bump off to his spike heel cunningst meshs. Men historically were taught that their role was to guard for country and the honour of love unitys keyst atomic number 53 syndicate. Wowork force were historically ingenious to be supportive economic aidmates, patiently hold for their love bingles to re-emerge as numbfishic victors of fight. Neither group was ever to swallow the the reliable - that fight is hell, regardless of who wins. terra firma state of fightf are I changed this running(a) emplace custodyt forever. realism war I was no animadversion to this sign romanticisticism. The manpower doting off to war were script in glorious terms as ultranationalistic tri ggermanes, the wo workforce were cost as trustful handmaidens, fulfilling the needs of their work force. The workforce who served were on the fightingfield, fiscal support finished the day-to-day offenses of the trenches. The women were kept posterior the lines, assisting in the processes of war - from swear outing with the building of munitions, to serving as nurses to the weakened, to staying guts end to bemoan the loss of loved whizzs. All of this was hypothecateed signly in the writings of both men and women. The shift in position was torpid to arrive b arly arrive it heretoforetually did as a result of a wricking new political tender movement sweeping finished Britain. Thanks to the emergence of the right to vote movement, women were belatedly cash in wizs chipsting acclimatized to a new role, ane that pronounced their independence, and proclaimed that they could govern and feel and do as they chose and as they be lie inved. If they knew the f air play, they could for the initial time r! eflect upon it and let the initiation go through it from their purview. As the growth of unconditional thought of the feminine position grew so alike did that of the male develop as well. As individually rouseual practice learned to express its true olfactions within the consideration of the times the grim realities of the war grow could be revealed to the beingness. As from each one gender reflected on the war, men with the harsh truth of the discover and women with the ability to draw up as a religious show that finally mattered ( up to now with the limitations that gender placed upon them), each faction could effectively acquaint the gravid War as it really was. The initial reactions of both genders to war were virtually identical - war was st beed in the most romantic of champions, with no real connection to the pain and suffering that war invokes. War was romantic, altruistic, and it was heroic. As time passed, war could no long-life be situation ed with this pastoral naivety. It was ugly, it was brutal, and it was geniusless. Reality fixate in for the boys in chromatic and for the women who soon came to realize that more(prenominal) of their men king never return home. Young men suddenly learned that war was non what they had anticipated, and their writings started to reflect on the brutality and ugliness of their conditions. As their perceptions changed, so too did those of the women back home ? and this time their political independence and unblock thought played a role as never forrader in expressing their coptfelt beliefs and views of war. The women of Great Britain, al micturate amidst the womens suffrage movement, were provided reinforced in their independence, to living in a world in which they could say and feel and do. If they knew the truth, it was now time to reflect upon it and to let the world see it from their perspective. As each gender reflected on the war, the men with the grim reality of exper ience and the women with the ability to write as a fa! ction that mattered pull d profess with the limitations that gender placed upon them, each faction could more effectively portray the Great War as it really was. The surrogate in perspective was slow to emerge further formerly it gained impetus it was hard to contain. Initially war was depicted in the chronic romantic way. However, things were starting to change as constituten in the numbers The Dragon and the Undying by Siegfried Sassoon. Initially it appears that this song is and an opposite aroundwhat romantic vision of war but looking more closely we see something else. The competitor and perhaps war itself is portrayed as a dreadful potassium bitartrate - it Reaches with grappling coils from t experience to town;/He lusts to let forbidden the loveliness of spires,/And hurls their martyred music toppling down. In lines three to five we view this enraged beast as powerful and widespread, destroying non only the defenses of the towns it conquers but seeking to d estroy the see to itts of the people through with(predicate) with(predicate) their religion, as referenced by the spires of the churches and the music of their martyrs. Through these lines we get the feeling that war destroys non only bodies but want and faith and culture as well. War is non so romantic anymore!This theme of destruction overcompensates throughout the coterminous lines. At line s scour, we become aware of the slain, homeless as the walkover, references perhaps to those who died on the battlefield, unburied and unblessed as they passed from this world. Their faces are the f beam, unshrouded night, implies that these men are young and fair, unshrouded possibly be opposite mention to the lack of last rites, they are unshriven and thereof not prepared to enter heaven. Yet, they tenderly stoop towards earth, to acclaim the impetuous heavens they leaveover unsung. This last line, piece of music gum olibanum farthermost dealing with those who pass on be en slain by the dragon that is the enemy, is a monit! or lizard again of the younker of the slain, with so much left unsung, earthbound unless reaching towards heaven. cool off somewhat romantic, this verse form at least attempts to set up a more harsh pic of the horrors of war, its destructive qualities, its effect on all aspects of livelihood and perhaps notably futurity as well. rime written by women feeling the betimes stages of the war seemed to be sort of sentimental to say the least. This tooshie be clearly present by Marian Allens requiem The Wind on the Downs in which she writes as a char charwoman left stool to mourn. This metrical composition avoids any depiction of violence or horror but rather deals purely with loss and denial: Beca apply they tell me, dear, that you are dead,/Because I endure no long-lived see your face,/You ready not died, it is not true, instead/You seek adventure in some other place. This verse ac comeledges the war with only one word - khaki. It is the tragic romance of the lost hero that is the source of inspiration, and it is from the perspective of the woman left behind, whose life is one of waiting for the soldier who impart never return home. Allen treats us to a romantic stroll in which she is able to revoke her feelings for her love, yet once again, denies the reader the modernity that identifies this war as a stepping point for British literature. As the war went on, the perspective of the poets writing about it slowly shifted. In direct tell apart to his earlier work, Siegfried Sassoons They is written in the style of an epigram, which according to Mirriam-Websters lexicon is a concise metrical composition dealing pointedly and frequently satirically with a single thought or upshot and oft ending with an ingenious turn of thought. Here we experience the soldiers peevishness towards those who remained at home, attempting tenderness and under hold uping for something that the soldier deems they know zip about. In this instance, the reader is introduced to a bishop who warns that When ! the boys come back/They will not be the kindred; for theyll corroborate fought/In a just cause. This poem truly deals with the War as a tangible thing, for Were none of us the alike! the boys reply. youll not start/A chap whos served that hasnt found some change. This is further spread out on as the boys promise the various injuries that they go through at war, Jim faces death, George has lost his legs, Bill is art and Bert has syphilis. Clearly this is not a romantic depiction of war, and charm it is shocking ample that a list of injuries received in battle is given, to promise to a bishop that one has a braceually transmitted malady is for certain not a traditional literary device. The horror of war is here in the new poetry of the times. No hourlong is war something that so-and-sonot be grasped and physically felt. Through the use of a short two-stanza poem, Sassoon is definitely renouncing his earlier dreams of dragons and slain breezes. curiously when one read s the last line, that of an ignorant bishop, left at home to continue to minister to those left behind and make heroes of those who curb left for battle: And the bishop said: The ways of God are grotesque! This unexpected twist of thought is a reminder of the naivety of those left at home, who did not see the trenches and experienced the stress of those who have fought there and perhaps there is even a questioning of ones religious beliefs as well. It is a far watchword from the initial depiction of war. Sassoon continues in this trend with his poem air of Women, in which he moves on to vilify the ignorance of the women left at home, You love us when were heroes, home on get off? you believe/That chivalry redeems the wars disgrace. Here again we see order of Sassoons anger towards those who remained in Britain, imagining the war yet not experiencing it. In this particular poem, he is describing the women he apparently returns home to, the women who are thrilled by the detail s of the war, yet cannot possibly dissemble the hor! rors: You cant believe that British troops retire... and they run,/Trampling the terrible corpses - dim with blood. He is once again use strong panache of speaking to shift perception and define the t illusion of what he experienced, hard to remove the sense of romance and resolution, so that it can be replaced with the truth that is the terrible cost of war. Jessie Popes poem The press seems to quarter precisely the kind of woman that Siegfried Sassoon is so adamantly stir by. Written in the for the first-year time stratum of the war, this poem asks of its gentlemen readers, Whos for the khaki suit? and continues on in a very truehearted fashion, asking my laddie if he is ready to join the multitude and stand for the Empire. It implies that the man who signs up for the host is eager to show his grit and swell the victors ranks, while the man who does not shall be a coward, a man wholl stand and bite his thumbs. This is the type of outlook that seems to so enrage Sas soon in his later works, and yet it was popular, published and definitely jingoistic. Popes poem is that of the woman who stands behind the men as the cheerleader, encouraging and hopeful. She also illustrations an opinion, and openly criticizes any man who is not for the trench. It is a strong female interpretive program that is hear in this poem, and while it instances a popular opinion, it is clearly agitating and modern in its goading. This military posture of the growing female fathom is clearly demonstrated in the poem Munition wages by Madeline Ida Bedford, where the reader is introduced to the verbalise of the working class woman. However, this poem is written by an educate woman in pass up of the munionettes who were typically paying no more than 2 pounds per calendar week (as remote to the five mentioned in the poem). Bedford attempts to describe the licentious conduct of the milling machinery girls, and clearly demonstrates the class lines that still flowed back in England. duration all women were recruited t! o work, the upper classes were often given roles of responsibility. (Bell, 93) Yet, as it describes a life possible for an item-by-item woman who might receipts from the freedom the war provides, the authors outlook forces the reader to return the poem as a satire, rather than a typographical error piece of poetry. However, it works as a reference to other pieces written during this time, as women took pleasure in working past of the home, living freely with their own money and rights, and can even begin to point us towards the womens suffrage movement. (Bell, 94-95). While thoughtful of the upper class female perspective of the time, it is clearly not romantic in its treatment of those who are working behind the lines for the war movement. A tremendous shift in perspective is emerging. It is the articulatio of the independent woman that is beginning to carry through the war, not just the women left to mourn and ponder the fortitude of their men, but those that made a succ ess of it, through their patriotic spirit or independence. Suddenly the voices of women were heard, published in the occasional papers and lifted up for being of use to the war effort. The above two female poets, rather traditional in their beliefs, reflect the growing movement of the voice of women, a voice that is neither romantic nor sentimental, but one that is reflective of their own personal viewpoints. It is impossible not to ignore the voices of the women who served on the touch of the war itself. Their voices begged to be heard. Eva Dobell was a British nurse who wrote the poem Pluck about one of her patients, a young man whose legs were smashed in the trenches. The reality of nursing during the war was horrible, with lice-infested, mud-crusted uniforms, anathematise bandages, gaping shrapnel wounds, hideously infected fractures, mustard gas burns, crazy coughing and choking from phosgene inhalation, groans and shrieks of pain, trauma from exposure, fatigue, and emo tional collapse.

(Gavin, 43) However, despite these conditions, her pity for him resounds throughout the poem. He is A child - so witless and so white,/He told a lie to get his way. This is the voice of the woman who has followed the soldiers to war, and who has seen the horror of it firsthand. She sees clearly the child who So broke with pain, he shrinks in dread/./And winds the clothes about his extend/That none may see his heart-sick fear./His shaking, strangled sobs you hear. Dobells voice is clear, see the boy behind the soldier, s sustentationd and shaking, a child who be about his age to be a man and help to fight the war. She knows that in the end, Hell face us all, a soldier yet and her poem remarks on the contrast between the hurt boy and the pride of a soldier who while wounded is not broken. Here we have a female poet experiencing first hand the horrors of war, who knows that soldiers are just youths, who knows that war kills and maims. She is willing to part that opinion with the rest of the world through the strong and independent voice of her poetry. Slowly emerging through the voices of male poets in this period is the concept that war is brutal, ugly, horrific. Written as a preface to a never published book, Wilfred Owen said: My government issue is war, and the pity of war. The poetry is in the pity.? (Williams, 3) He shows this perspective as he decries the hypocrisy of the romance of war in his poem, Disabled, as he describes a legless soldier, sent home from the war. other boy who had asked to join. He didnt have to beg;/Smiling they wrote his lie: aged nineteen years. Yet this boy is not in the hospital and does not have the kind nurse to care for him, instead he sits in a wheeled cha ir, waiting for dark. This soldiers story is one of a! return home and of what awaits, and while it cries out for pity as a tragedy, it is also a limiting tale. It tells of the limits of the wounded soldier, not of his pride, but of his fall from wholeness, agreeable whatever pity they may dole. The young man who linked the war to look a god in kilts. and by luck too, to please his Meg is now the tragic figure. It closes with this same sense of helplessness: How cold and late it is! Why dont they come/And fag end him into bed? Why dont they come? Clearly, the romance of war is gone, replaced by the horrible aftereffects. According to Oscar Williams, war poetry is an unpopular and uninformed art form, as most people do not have the courage to face honestly the facts of others intense suffering. It is easier to have the attention diverted, the guilt of responsibility converted into a hatred that the suffering is justified since it is in a noble cause. (Williams, 5) It is this initial reaction that the poetry of globe War I di splays, exploitation romantic and sentimental terms so as to regular the people of Great Britain, rather than scare them with the vivid truth of life in the trenches. Where initially patriotism and the call to irritation are treated with exuberance and romanticism by authors of both sexes, both men and women develop their own perspectives - men reacting to the horrors of the front, and women responding to the tragedies of losing loved ones, going to work and facing the front alongside the men as they helped to treat the wounded and dying. World War I came as the womens suffrage movement was at its most uncivilized and those women who had once sung out for the vote used these same voices to call for their country and to support their government, which in turn resulted in a strong female voice throughout the war. These women can also see clearly that their voices are important amidst this battle and that they too can be of service to their country, either by recording vignettes of the war as they see it or by pushing the men to b! ear arms for their country. Each sex matters, each sex has a different perspective, and both of these perspectives are worth examining - what truly is wonderful is that we can finally hear both factions. And as the voices emerged, there appeared to be a public chord in the song of war - it was no longer the sentimental, it was no longer heroic. War was real and each poetic sex strove to depict it in the voices of their convictions. Works CitedAllen, Marian. ?The Wind on the Downs.? ? base to First World War Poetry.? OxfordUniversity. 4 November 1996. 26 November 2006< http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/projects/jtap/tutorials/intro/women/>Bedford, Madeline Ina. ?Munition Wages.? ? inlet to First World War Poetry.? OxfordUniversity. 4 November 1996. 26 November 2006< http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/projects/jtap/tutorials/intro/women/>Bell, Amy Helen. nought were we Spared?: British Women Poets of the Great War. DalhousieUniversity, Halifax, Nova Scotia, December 1996. 91-95. 26 November 20 06Braybon, Gail. ?Women, War and Work.? World War I. Ed. Donald J. Murphy, Greenhaven squeeze, Inc.; San Diego, 2002. 184-195Dobell, Eva. ?Pluck.? ?Introduction to First World War Poetry.? Oxford University. 4November 1996. 26 November 2006Gavin, Lettie. American Women in World War I. University Press of carbon monoxide gas; Colorado, 1997. 43-67Lee, Stuart. ?Introduction to First World War Poetry.? Oxford University. 4 November 1996. 26November 2006 Owen, Wilfred. ?Disabled,? Studies in ordinal atomic number 6 British Literature in the lead 1945 hangReader. Compiled by Mary Ann Gillies and Aurelea Mahood. Simon Fraser University, 2006. 2.21Pope, Jessie. ?The Call.? ?Introduction to First World War Poetry?. Oxford University. 4November 1996. 26 November 2006Sassoon, Siegfried. ?The Dragon and the Undying.? Studies in ordinal Century BritishLiterature Before 1945 Course Reader. Compiled by Mary Ann Gillies and Aurelea Mahood. Simon Fraser University, 2006. 2.13Sassoon, Siegfr ied. ?They.? Studies in Twentieth Century British Lit! erature Before 1945 CourseReader. Compiled by Mary Ann Gillies and Aurelea Mahood. Simon Fraser University, 2006. 2.16Sassoon, Siegfried. ?Glory of Women,? Studies in Twentieth Century British Literature Before1945 Course Reader. Compiled by Mary Ann Gillies and Aurelea Mahood. Simon Fraser University, 2006. 2.17Walsh, Ben. ?Gallery stage setting: Gaining Women?s Suffrage.? The interior(a) Archives. 26November 2006 Williams, Oscar, ed. The War Poets; The John Day Co.; New York, 1945. 3-11Zdrok, Jodie L. ed. World War I (Greenhaven Press? Great Speeches in account statement Series);Greenhaven Press; Michigan, 2004. 8-20, 25-33 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay